tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1841109373422872120.post903281420310978073..comments2023-10-11T06:56:30.429-04:00Comments on PARANOIDS ONLINE: Where Howard and Noam Won’t RoamJoan d'Archttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04025857935581509395noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1841109373422872120.post-23341254385548447612009-05-02T11:20:00.000-04:002009-05-02T11:20:00.000-04:00Good info. They're like state-sanctioned "intellec...Good info. They're like state-sanctioned "intellectuals" or "dissidents", who just "oppose" the state on minor safe issues but align with it on major critical ones like 911, JFK, the privately-owned Federal Reserve, in spite of the convincing evidence to the contrary, thus revealing their true allegiance.Damienhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10243828494487526251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1841109373422872120.post-25109289404531095892009-05-02T08:53:00.000-04:002009-05-02T08:53:00.000-04:00Also see this comment at the above link: http://ww...Also see this comment at the above link: http://www.oilempire.us/chomsky.html<br /><br />His attitude, post-9/11, is in many ways a repeat of an episode a decade ago, when he and a handful of other "leftist" figures signed onto a savage establishment media attack on Oliver Stone and his film JFK, which brought an interpretation of the JFK assassination conspiracy to the public. In addition to defending the Warren Commission report's "lone gunman" findings, these anti-conspiratorialists made a peculiar far-fetched hedge, claiming that the assassination did not result in any significant changes to US policy or the political power structure, and hence need not concern Left political analysis in the slightest!Joan d'Archttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04025857935581509395noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1841109373422872120.post-80472303222375856822009-05-02T08:50:00.000-04:002009-05-02T08:50:00.000-04:00Yeah, it's completely preposterous that he would s...Yeah, it's completely preposterous that he would say these things:<br /><br /> ZNet Sustainer:Considering the long history of false flag operations to wrongly justify wars, our most recent precedent being WMD in Iraq, The Gulf of Tonkin in Vietnam, going back much further to Pearl Harbor (FDR knowingly allowing the Japanese to bomb Pearl Harbor – which is different from false flag operations), to the 1898 Spanish-American War, to the 1846 Mexican-American War, to Andrew Jackson’s seizing of Seminole land in 1812 (aka Florida).<br /><br />Noam Chomsky: The concept of "false flag operation" is not a very serious one, in my opinion. None of the examples you describe, or any other in history, has even a remote resemblance to the alleged 9/11 conspiracy. I'd suggest that you look at each of them carefully.Joan d'Archttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04025857935581509395noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1841109373422872120.post-60875461716807467342009-05-01T23:55:00.000-04:002009-05-01T23:55:00.000-04:00That's how the CIA establishment works--they have ...That's how the CIA establishment works--they have people that appear "anti-establishment" but are really agents of it.Damienhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10243828494487526251noreply@blogger.com