By Joel Carlinsky
I recently had an e-mail from David Wells, the Commanding Officer of a group of weather-control fanatics called the Weather Rangers. At the conclusion of this letter, he wrote the following:
" A well placed .................. machine can bring them ( hurricanes ) down to tropical depression before they make land fall. We will see if they can be stopped this year".
The Weather Rangers are a world-wide internet-facilitated group of persons who suffer from a condition psychiatrists call "lilapsophobia", meaning an irrational fear of extreme weather. Persons with this condition consider the atmosphere to be dangerous. Indeed, normal weather is seen as a menace and they often think the human species cannot survive unless it gains control of the weather.
Lilapsophobia - Fear of Tornadoes and Hurricanes or Lilapsophobia
http://phobias.about.com/od/phobiaslist/a/lilapsophobia.htm
Before the advent of the internet, such people were isolated oddballs, but now, with quick, easy global communication, they can find each other and gain social re-inforcement for their feelings of anxiety. Unfortunately, they also have quick, easy access to information on forms of weather-modification technology that enable them to act on their delusions.
And act they intend to do. Alberto Feliciano, de facto Second-In-Command of the Weather Rangers, has re-located to southern Florida just so he can be in the right location to weaken or divert hurricanes that would otherwise strike the Eastern Seaboard. While this might make him popular with home-owners and insurance companies, it would be a disaster from an ecological point of view.
The areas where hurricanes are frequent are well-adapted to them and need them to maintain normal ecological conditions. A quick search on Google found numerous articles, including peer-reviewed scientific studies, showing the vital importance of hurricanes to coastal areas, and even far inland. There is no room for doubt: without the periodic hurricanes, the coastal regions of the southeastern United States would be a far different place, ---and from a biological and biodiversity standpoint, a far poorer one.
Science: The Benefits Of Hurricanes - TIME
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,907967,00.html
Answers.com - What are the benefits of a hurricane
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_benefits_of_a_hurricane
Hurricanes Bring Benefits to Barrier Islands and Beaches, Even as ...
http://today.duke.edu/2004/09/hurricane_tip_0904.html
None of which means anything to the Weather Rangers. Their psychological condition rules out giving any consideration to ecological concerns. Both Mr. Wells and Mr. Feliciano have been informed of the dangers associated with their plans, and both have decided to continue despite the scientific data that has been provided to them. Apparently, they fear the normal functioning of the atmosphere more than they fear an ecological disaster of their own making.
Of course, weather modification in the United States is subject to many laws and regulations,
Weather Modification Law in the USA
http://www.rbs2.com/weather.pdf
http://http://law.onecle.com/florida/public-health/403.301.html
http://law.onecle.com/florida/public-health/403.321.html
http://law.onecle.com/florida/public-health/403.411.html
including a Federal requirement to report any proposed weather-modification operations in advance to NOAA, and in the state of Florida, to obtain a license and carry insurance to compensate potential victims for any unwanted side-effects that may occur. The Florida law also requires anyone proposing to do any weather-modification to publish a notice in advance.The Weather Rangers have not made even the slightest attempt to comply with any of these laws.
Unfortunately, the authorities are in no hurry to prosecute. In fact, given the popular misconception that human interference in the weather is impossible, the prospect of convincing the legal authorities to investigate and bring criminal charges is remote. It is therefore up to concerned individuals to oppose this irresponsible scheme to interfere with the normal functioning of the atmosphere.
The prospect of initiating a civil suit for damages is somewhat better, since any private citizen could do that, but since the Weather Rangers are hobbyists, not a business, and do not have the funding that would interest a lawyer in taking a case against them on a contingency-fee basis, that possible avenue will have to wait until funding is available.
So, just in case, unlikely as it seems, the Weather Rangers can be persuaded by the pressure of public opinion, please take the time to send them an e-mail at:
"alberto feliciano" ( alfelici at gmail )
"David Wells" ( davidwells3 at gmail )
politely and diplomaticly pointing out the many legal, social, ecological, and ethical reasons why they should not be undertaking this project to prevent hurricanes.
Please send me a copy of anything you send them and any response you may get for my records.
And please forward this message to any person or group whom you think might be interested. Thank you.
Joel Carlinsky
( joelcarlinsky@yahoo.com )
Prevent Atmosphere Abuse! Fight Cloudbuster Proliferation!
Join The Society For Atmospheric Self-Regulation
http://www.orgonomicecology.blogspot.com
Showing posts with label David Wells’ Weather Engineering. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Wells’ Weather Engineering. Show all posts
06 May, 2010
Weather Control Vs. Planet Earth
The Weather Rangers
By Joel Carlinsky
My recent series of messages expressing concern about the prospect of weather control technology being misused to interfere with normal atmospheric metabolism brought me a number of angry responses from some readers who seem not to understand the point I was trying to make. Most of them seemed to think any weather that kills people or harms their crops is bad weather and should be prevented. Some of them expanded the list of bad weather conditions to include any weather that destroys other property as well.
This attitude is short-sighted. It is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the atmosphere. People who evaluate anything the atmosphere does according to how it affects human life and property in the short term fail to recognize that the atmosphere is not just a non-living inanimate mass of non-living gases. It is a well-organized system of closely-related components that work together just as the components of a living organism do. Interference with the functioning of the system in any one part can seriously disrupt the entire system.
The atmosphere has a metabolism just as a living organism does. In the normal course of this metabolism, a certain amount of the atmospheric energy is processed through a series of stages, cycling from lively, moving OR to DOR, to water, and back again, and forming the main components of the atmosphere along the way. The nitrogen, carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen that are the basic gases in the atmosphere are formed as a result of this process of atmospheric metabolism.
It is not just an accidental coincidence that these elements are also the main elements found in the living organism. Living organisms are a part of the atmospheric processes. The general vitality of all living things in an area depends to a very great degree on the functioning of the biological energy field to which they are exposed. Normal weather and normal health are both parts of the same underlying phenomenon.
Weather becomes stuck in a state of chronic drought when excess DOR builds up in an area. If the DOR situation goes on long enough, the drought become permanent and the area becomes a desert. This is not only a question of rainfall. Desert life-forms show biological characteristics typical of deserts, quite aside from those associated with less water. In many species, including humans, this can extend to behavioral characteristics as well as morphological ones.
Strong circulatory storm systems such as hurricanes and tornadoes are a self-healing reaction by the living atmospheric energy to clean itself of DOR and bring back the mobility of the normal moving atmospheric energy. When there is a lot of DOR around, a strong movement is triggered, usually in the form of a tornado, that reverses the stagnation and afterwards the atmosphere and the biosphere both are functioning far better.
There has always been some DOR. It is a natural part of the metabolic cycle of both atmosphere and organism. But in the last 60-odd years, the amount of DOR has been vastly increased by the advent of nuclear technology on this planet. Both nuclear explosions and more slowly, but just as inexorably, nuclear power plants, produce huge amounts of DOR. To a lesser, but still significant degree, any electromagnetic technology does the same. Deforestation of large areas and the damning of large rivers also contribute significantly to the stagnation of the atmospheric energy.
As a result, the normal atmosphere is increasingly hard pressed to cope with this ongoing assault, and an increase in strong storms is the result as the atmospheric energy tries to clean itself and remain capable of functioning. Any interference with this self-healing response by any technological means would be extremely ill-advised since the re-mobilization of the atmospheric energy is vital to metabolism of all living things as well as being the only process by which the atmosphere can return to normal behavior over the long term.
The mechanistic conception of the atmosphere as dead, inanimate, and nothing but a non-living mass of gases that just happens to do whatever it does at random, without any coordinated purpose or over-all organization is a reflection of the dead and deadened biosystem of the mechanists, who are unable to feel the life energy in their own bodies and project their lack of life sensations onto the cosmos via theories of a non-living natural world. These theories of a dead, non-living atmosphere mislead mechanistic thinkers into the idea that intervention in the interests of preventing "bad weather" can do no harm.
Nothing could be farther from the truth. Halting the healing process of the atmosphere to prevent short-term highly-localized damage from storms will inevitably end up causing far more damage than any number of storms could ever cause. Carried far enough, such well-intended but ignorant tampering could spell the ultimate death of the atmosphere of the earth.
The Reich cloudbuster is the only effective means of purposeful intervention in atmospheric behavior. The attempts by cloudseeders to augment precipitation by adding condensation nuclei to selected clouds have failed to produce any convincing evidence even after over 60 years of trying. And while several unorthodox inventors have made exaggerated claims for various electromagnetic devices purported to "control weather", none have ever done any better. An understanding of the orgone energy field of the earth and how it underlies all atmospheric behavior conclusively rules out any possibility of anyone ever inventing any electromagnetic method of effective weather control.
So I am not really too concerned at some deluded crackpots like the so-called "Weather Rangers", who claim to be able to control weather with some electrical device really being able to do any harm. All they could possibly do with any such device is just what all other electromagnetic technology does; add a little bit to the total amount of DOR in the world and make the over-all condition of the atmosphere just a little bit worse.
But what is dangerous about these people is not their bogus and ineffective technology, but their mechanistic attitude. They are setting a horrendous precedent. If at some future date some such irresponsible group like the Weather Rangers were ever to start using real cloudbusters instead of the crackpot equipment these deluded cranks are using, the world could be in very bad trouble indeed.
That is why I thought the ignorance and misconceptions on which the Weather Rangers are basing their actions should be exposed and contrasted to the healing practice of atmospheric medicine with the cloudbuster as advocated by Reich and those who understand the proper use of the cloudbuster to help a damaged atmosphere return to healthy self-regulation.
By Joel Carlinsky
My recent series of messages expressing concern about the prospect of weather control technology being misused to interfere with normal atmospheric metabolism brought me a number of angry responses from some readers who seem not to understand the point I was trying to make. Most of them seemed to think any weather that kills people or harms their crops is bad weather and should be prevented. Some of them expanded the list of bad weather conditions to include any weather that destroys other property as well.
This attitude is short-sighted. It is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the atmosphere. People who evaluate anything the atmosphere does according to how it affects human life and property in the short term fail to recognize that the atmosphere is not just a non-living inanimate mass of non-living gases. It is a well-organized system of closely-related components that work together just as the components of a living organism do. Interference with the functioning of the system in any one part can seriously disrupt the entire system.
The atmosphere has a metabolism just as a living organism does. In the normal course of this metabolism, a certain amount of the atmospheric energy is processed through a series of stages, cycling from lively, moving OR to DOR, to water, and back again, and forming the main components of the atmosphere along the way. The nitrogen, carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen that are the basic gases in the atmosphere are formed as a result of this process of atmospheric metabolism.
It is not just an accidental coincidence that these elements are also the main elements found in the living organism. Living organisms are a part of the atmospheric processes. The general vitality of all living things in an area depends to a very great degree on the functioning of the biological energy field to which they are exposed. Normal weather and normal health are both parts of the same underlying phenomenon.
Weather becomes stuck in a state of chronic drought when excess DOR builds up in an area. If the DOR situation goes on long enough, the drought become permanent and the area becomes a desert. This is not only a question of rainfall. Desert life-forms show biological characteristics typical of deserts, quite aside from those associated with less water. In many species, including humans, this can extend to behavioral characteristics as well as morphological ones.
Strong circulatory storm systems such as hurricanes and tornadoes are a self-healing reaction by the living atmospheric energy to clean itself of DOR and bring back the mobility of the normal moving atmospheric energy. When there is a lot of DOR around, a strong movement is triggered, usually in the form of a tornado, that reverses the stagnation and afterwards the atmosphere and the biosphere both are functioning far better.
There has always been some DOR. It is a natural part of the metabolic cycle of both atmosphere and organism. But in the last 60-odd years, the amount of DOR has been vastly increased by the advent of nuclear technology on this planet. Both nuclear explosions and more slowly, but just as inexorably, nuclear power plants, produce huge amounts of DOR. To a lesser, but still significant degree, any electromagnetic technology does the same. Deforestation of large areas and the damning of large rivers also contribute significantly to the stagnation of the atmospheric energy.
As a result, the normal atmosphere is increasingly hard pressed to cope with this ongoing assault, and an increase in strong storms is the result as the atmospheric energy tries to clean itself and remain capable of functioning. Any interference with this self-healing response by any technological means would be extremely ill-advised since the re-mobilization of the atmospheric energy is vital to metabolism of all living things as well as being the only process by which the atmosphere can return to normal behavior over the long term.
The mechanistic conception of the atmosphere as dead, inanimate, and nothing but a non-living mass of gases that just happens to do whatever it does at random, without any coordinated purpose or over-all organization is a reflection of the dead and deadened biosystem of the mechanists, who are unable to feel the life energy in their own bodies and project their lack of life sensations onto the cosmos via theories of a non-living natural world. These theories of a dead, non-living atmosphere mislead mechanistic thinkers into the idea that intervention in the interests of preventing "bad weather" can do no harm.
Nothing could be farther from the truth. Halting the healing process of the atmosphere to prevent short-term highly-localized damage from storms will inevitably end up causing far more damage than any number of storms could ever cause. Carried far enough, such well-intended but ignorant tampering could spell the ultimate death of the atmosphere of the earth.
The Reich cloudbuster is the only effective means of purposeful intervention in atmospheric behavior. The attempts by cloudseeders to augment precipitation by adding condensation nuclei to selected clouds have failed to produce any convincing evidence even after over 60 years of trying. And while several unorthodox inventors have made exaggerated claims for various electromagnetic devices purported to "control weather", none have ever done any better. An understanding of the orgone energy field of the earth and how it underlies all atmospheric behavior conclusively rules out any possibility of anyone ever inventing any electromagnetic method of effective weather control.
So I am not really too concerned at some deluded crackpots like the so-called "Weather Rangers", who claim to be able to control weather with some electrical device really being able to do any harm. All they could possibly do with any such device is just what all other electromagnetic technology does; add a little bit to the total amount of DOR in the world and make the over-all condition of the atmosphere just a little bit worse.
But what is dangerous about these people is not their bogus and ineffective technology, but their mechanistic attitude. They are setting a horrendous precedent. If at some future date some such irresponsible group like the Weather Rangers were ever to start using real cloudbusters instead of the crackpot equipment these deluded cranks are using, the world could be in very bad trouble indeed.
That is why I thought the ignorance and misconceptions on which the Weather Rangers are basing their actions should be exposed and contrasted to the healing practice of atmospheric medicine with the cloudbuster as advocated by Reich and those who understand the proper use of the cloudbuster to help a damaged atmosphere return to healthy self-regulation.
18 April, 2010
David Wells’ Weather Engineering
A response by Joel Carlinsky
Subject: Weather Rangers Potential Menace to Global Ecology
To: David Wells
Date: Sunday, April 11, 2010, 10:44 AM
From: Joel Carlinsky
Re: http://pesn.com/2009/09/14/9501573_David_Wells_Weather_Rangers/
Dear Mr. Wells:
I got your invitation to join your Weather Rangers group as you had told me I would, and I joined the group for just long enough to take a good look through your website. Then I unsubscribed myself from the group.
I have not tried your equipment, so I will not at this time address myself to the effectiveness of it. I will, however, address what I consider a far more important issue: potential ecological impact and ecological responsibility.
Frankly, I was rather horrified at some of the attitudes expressed there. In particular, the willingness to condone the wonton destruction of hurricanes and tornados. If I remained in the group I would end up in the role of a Jimminy Cricket, constantly reminding the group to consider ecological factors that they seem determined to ignore.
The atmosphere today is in a seriously debilitated state, dying, in fact, as a result of all the modern technologies humans are inflicting on it. The worst environmental disaster of our times is the stagnation of the atmospheric energy caused by nuclear power reactors, and other technological sources of energetic stagnation.
The proper use of any method of intervention in atmospheric activity is to help the sick dying atmospheric energy field recover to a normal level of pulstation and flow, not to obstruct the chances of recovery by interfering with the strong circulatory systems that are a natural effort on the part of the atmosphere to relieve the stagnation and return to normal. We need more strong storms, not less.
Such storms are the natural reaction to stagnation, the means by which the atmosphere tries to rid itself of the dead, toxic energy that has accumulated and recover normal pulsation capacity. If your device does indeed work at all, as you seem convinced it does, your group is vandalizing what remains of our atmosphere and I hope you understand why I do not wish to be a part of it in any way.
I understand you mean well, but your disregard of ecological factors and the Precautionary Principal in particular, is frightening. I have written extensively about the damage being done to an already wounded atmosphere by some other enthusiasts who also do not understand what they are doing, and I will send you some of those articles to illustrate what I mean in detail. Feel free to post them to the group if you wish.
The atmosphere needs to be helped and therefore I am not against all weather working. It is needed to off-set the stagnation being caused by the use of nuclear and electromagnetic technology. But the proper goal of any responsible weather work is to restore the atmosphere to the point where it can self-regulate and no more work is needed. I saw no concept of atmospheric self-regulation on your groups site. On the contrary, the people there seem to gloat over the ability to "control weather" and contemplate doing so forever, not getting atmospheric conditions back to normal and then leaving them alone.
No large-scale weather work should be done without an ecologist as part of the team in the early planning stages. I saw nothing about ecology on your group website. If you decide to become responsible about what you are doing, as a long-time environmental activist, I know several trained professional ecologists who would be available as consultants. Without such input you and your associates are an environmental menace on a par with the nuclear industry and other industries that are vandalizing the earth.
Joel Carlinsky
Subject: Weather Rangers Potential Menace to Global Ecology
To: David Wells
Date: Sunday, April 11, 2010, 10:44 AM
From: Joel Carlinsky
Re: http://pesn.com/2009/09/14/9501573_David_Wells_Weather_Rangers/
Dear Mr. Wells:
I got your invitation to join your Weather Rangers group as you had told me I would, and I joined the group for just long enough to take a good look through your website. Then I unsubscribed myself from the group.
I have not tried your equipment, so I will not at this time address myself to the effectiveness of it. I will, however, address what I consider a far more important issue: potential ecological impact and ecological responsibility.
Frankly, I was rather horrified at some of the attitudes expressed there. In particular, the willingness to condone the wonton destruction of hurricanes and tornados. If I remained in the group I would end up in the role of a Jimminy Cricket, constantly reminding the group to consider ecological factors that they seem determined to ignore.
The atmosphere today is in a seriously debilitated state, dying, in fact, as a result of all the modern technologies humans are inflicting on it. The worst environmental disaster of our times is the stagnation of the atmospheric energy caused by nuclear power reactors, and other technological sources of energetic stagnation.
The proper use of any method of intervention in atmospheric activity is to help the sick dying atmospheric energy field recover to a normal level of pulstation and flow, not to obstruct the chances of recovery by interfering with the strong circulatory systems that are a natural effort on the part of the atmosphere to relieve the stagnation and return to normal. We need more strong storms, not less.
Such storms are the natural reaction to stagnation, the means by which the atmosphere tries to rid itself of the dead, toxic energy that has accumulated and recover normal pulsation capacity. If your device does indeed work at all, as you seem convinced it does, your group is vandalizing what remains of our atmosphere and I hope you understand why I do not wish to be a part of it in any way.
I understand you mean well, but your disregard of ecological factors and the Precautionary Principal in particular, is frightening. I have written extensively about the damage being done to an already wounded atmosphere by some other enthusiasts who also do not understand what they are doing, and I will send you some of those articles to illustrate what I mean in detail. Feel free to post them to the group if you wish.
The atmosphere needs to be helped and therefore I am not against all weather working. It is needed to off-set the stagnation being caused by the use of nuclear and electromagnetic technology. But the proper goal of any responsible weather work is to restore the atmosphere to the point where it can self-regulate and no more work is needed. I saw no concept of atmospheric self-regulation on your groups site. On the contrary, the people there seem to gloat over the ability to "control weather" and contemplate doing so forever, not getting atmospheric conditions back to normal and then leaving them alone.
No large-scale weather work should be done without an ecologist as part of the team in the early planning stages. I saw nothing about ecology on your group website. If you decide to become responsible about what you are doing, as a long-time environmental activist, I know several trained professional ecologists who would be available as consultants. Without such input you and your associates are an environmental menace on a par with the nuclear industry and other industries that are vandalizing the earth.
Joel Carlinsky
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)